Epilepsy Research
Volume 27, Issue 3 , Pages 205-213, June 1997

A double-blind controlled clinical trial of oxcarbazepine versus phenytoin in children and adolescents with epilepsy1

  • Marilisa M Guerreiro

      Affiliations

    • Neurological Department, Faculty of Medicine, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil
  • ,
  • Ulf Vigonius

      Affiliations

    • Novartis Sverige AB, Västra Frölunda, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Present address: Novartis Sverige AB, P.O. Box 1150, S-183 11 Taeby, Sweden.
  • ,
  • Harald Pohlmann

      Affiliations

    • Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Maria Luiza G de Manreza

      Affiliations

    • Neurological Department, Hospital Das Clinicas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Natalio Fejerman

      Affiliations

    • Neurological Department, Children Hospital `Professor Dr Juan P. Garrahan', Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • ,
  • Sergio A Antoniuk

      Affiliations

    • Neurological Department, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Gracas, Curitiba, Brazil
  • ,
  • Alan Moore

      Affiliations

    • Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Received 26 March 1997; received in revised form 11 April 1997; accepted 13 April 1997.

Abstract 

In many countries oxcarbazepine (OXC) has been registered for use as first-line and add-on treatment for patients with partial seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures (PS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures without partial onset (GTCS). Its use as monotherapy in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed epilepsy was investigated in this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group comparison with phenytoin (PHT). A total of 193 patients aged 5–18 years with either PS or GTCS were enrolled. After a retrospective baseline assessment, patients were randomized to OXC or PHT in a 1:1 ratio. The double-blind treatment phase comprised two periods: an 8-week flexible titration period; followed by 48 weeks maintenance treatment. In the efficacy analyses, there were no statistically significant differences between OXC and PHT. Forty-nine (61%) patients in the OXC group and 46 (60%) in the PHT group were seizure-free during the maintenance period. In total, 24 patients in the OXC group discontinued treatment prematurely (two for tolerability reasons) compared with 34 in the PHT group (14 for tolerability reasons). The number of premature discontinuations due to adverse experiences was statistically significantly lower in the OXC group than in the PHT group. Moreover, the odds of an individual discontinuing prematurely (regardless of reason) were almost twice as high in the PHT group. This trial provides further support for the efficacy and safety of OXC as first-line treatment in children and adolescents with PS and GTCS. In addition, the results show that OXC in these patients has significant advantages over PHT in terms of tolerability and treatment retention.

Keywords:  Oxcarbazepine, Phenytoin, Children, Long-term treatment, Monotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  • 1 This work was carried out on behalf of the International Pediatric Oxcarbazepine/Phenytoin Trial Group (Appendix A).

PII: S0920-1211(97)00025-9

Epilepsy Research
Volume 27, Issue 3 , Pages 205-213, June 1997