Epilepsy Research
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 47-55, May 1996

Standardisation of a self-report questionnaire for use in evaluating cognitive, affective and behavioural side-effects of anti-epileptic drug treatments

  • R. Gillham

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK
  • ,
  • G. Baker

      Affiliations

    • University Department of Neurosciences, Liverpool, UK
  • ,
  • P. Thompson

      Affiliations

    • Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont, Bucks., UK
  • ,
  • K. Birbeck

      Affiliations

    • Kings College Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • A. McGuire

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Wales, Cardiff, UK
  • ,
  • L. Tomlinson

      Affiliations

    • St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • L. Eckersley

      Affiliations

    • Wellcome Research Laboratories, Beckenham, Kent, UK
  • ,
  • C. Silveira

      Affiliations

    • David Lewis Centre for Epilepsy, Manchester, UK
  • ,
  • S. Brown

      Affiliations

    • Wellcome Research Laboratories, Beckenham, Kent, UK

Received 1 June 1995; accepted 23 November 1995.

Abstract 

The development and standardisation of an inventory for measuring anti-epileptic drug effects on cognition and affect is described. The Side Effect and Life Satisfaction inventory (SEALS) was derived from symptoms and side-effects reported by a patient population. It was administered to 45 patients on two occasions and test-retest reliability was demonstrated. It was administered to 923 patients with epilepsy. An underlying factor structure was produced by principal components analysis, consisting of five sub-scales which were stable when data from males and females were analysed separately or together. Validity was evaluated by comparing inventory scores of patients undergoing a number of treatment trials to show that the inventory was sensitive to treatment differences when other variables were controlled. Patients taking two or more anti-epileptic drugs had poorer SEALS scores than those taking a single drug. Patients taking vigabatrin and one other AED had poorer scores than those taking lamotrigine (LTG) and one other AED. A comparison of changes from baseline to week 4 of a double blind comparison of carbamazepine (CBZ) and LTG showed significantly greater improvement in SEALS scores for patients taking LTG, and significantly poorer scores in those patients taking CBZ who dropped out of the study, than in those who continued. It is concluded that SEALS is a valid and reliable tool for use in anti-epileptic drug trials.

Keywords:  Anti-epileptic drug, Side-effect, Inventory, Standardisation, Reliability, Validity

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: 0920-1211(95)00102-6

Epilepsy Research
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 47-55, May 1996